Compare
E-sign asks “did they sign?” We ask “did they understand?”
Most evaluations weigh GetConsent against three incumbents: paper, a generic e-signature tool, and the consent field in the EMR. Below is an honest, capability-for-capability view of each, including where the alternative is genuinely the better tool for a narrower job. An honest comparison is easier to verify than a flattering one.
Comparison
vs Paper
Paper & the status quo
Compare
Comparison
vs E-signature
Generic e-signature tools
Compare
Comparison
vs EMR module
EMR & PMS built-in consent
Compare
The honest summary
Paper, generic e-signature, and your EMR’s consent field each cover part of the job. GetConsent brings comprehension verification, a tamper-evident evidence pack, informed financial consent, PROMs, satisfaction measurement, accreditation governance (such as NSQHS Standard 2), and enterprise integration together in one workflow. Where one of these alternatives is the better fit for a narrower job, these pages say so plainly.
Get started
Two ways to start, depending on the size of your problem
Clinics & practices
Send a real consent today
Solo clinicians and small practices set up in an afternoon and send their first consent the same day. No procurement, no sales call, no card. Nothing about your current process has to change until you are satisfied.
Hospitals & networks
See it run on your workflow
Multi-site hospitals and networks get a 30-minute demo configured for your EMR, your SSO, and the governance reports your accreditors actually ask for. You leave with a working trial account.